... Easy one. In Tactical scale, an MU is 50 meters long. This fits the 6 km/h per MP and 30 second turns. However, in Skirmish, the turn is cut down by a...
... As I use almost exclusively Skirmish scale, I'll pop in my opinions here :-) The multiplication is a factor of the ground scale, whereas the MU distance is...
... Yes, I agree, multiplying AE by 5 is excessive, but Range Bands are OK. With larger scale minis (and so MU) Skirmish scale rarely gets out of Short range,...
What kind of colour schemes can I go for? I got a T44 for £4 (!), so I decided to build a small detachment or Russians, as a change from 8th Army. Am I stuck...
... Bands are ... gets ... I was thinking more about this and I guess it makes sense to multiply the ranges by 5, since otherwise the ranges of certain weapons...
Two bits of news: If anyone is going to the San Diego Comicon, I know jonathan breese from pod corps san diego is going to be running a gear krieg demo all day...
... so ... change from ... I don't know much about Russian anything, but it says in the allied sourcebook that some of their paint ended up comming out more...
... Agreed. It would be quite hard to find any attack that filled an entire 50m-diameter circle, except perhaps for air-deployed ordnance (aka. bombs) and...
... Bleh. Got my numbers wrong. Revised version below: AE0: a 10-meter diameter circle hitting a 50-meter circle. If targeted, it will also attack those in...
... so ... Russian & Soviet stuff was green. Dark green. Olive on occasion, but basically green. Any old dark green will do, with liberal mud. But barring...
... from ... but ... on ... I ... OK, cool. Next question - why are there two different T-44 tanks? There's the T-44 Nikolai Lenin land battleship, and then,...
... AFAIK, ... Being at work right now, I don't have my rulebooks to check on GK pseudo-history, but here's my thoughts: As well as the purely fictional T44,...
... No it doesn't. Must remove head from rectum when writing rules suggestions... I meant to say that AE4 to AE8 in Skirmish scale equate AE 1 in Tactical...
Hey all, I was just sort of checking in after a brief (but feelign much longer) absence from the internet. I have moved to a new home and now have new,...
From what I can tell there is no connection between Old Glory's own 15mm arm and the OldGlory15s site that the QC stuff is connected too. Nineteenth Century...
Hey everybody, I've constructed a list of my additions to the frequently asked questions list that is hopefully still being made up, though I'm not sure how...
... not ... before... ... No answers, but another question: In thw WC, the basic Churchill version is the Mk IV. under the Variants header, the first one is...
... Don't have my books to hand, but these facts should be relevant: Firstly, the Churchill IS the Mk IV - Infantry Tank Mk IV, A22, Churchill Second, the...
... V? ... Hmmm. then the variant is a "Churchill IV". wonder what th base variant is: 2pdr gun, LMG, 3" howitzer. Dammit, they've done it again - I go and buy...
... That's the Churchill I, 2pdr and MG in turret, 3" in the hull. The II replaced the 3" howitzer with a bow MG, but almost all were rebuilt as IIIs and IVs...
... saying: Cannot ... firing the ... Ah, yes, my favourite bit of WW2 vehicle trivia (not so trivial for the driver...) :-) Beautiful bit of design, that......
... keeping ... Oh? I had a look at the book today, and none of the British stuff got any new variants that weren't in the WGC (except the Ironside and mole)....
... got ... I don't have the Allies book yet (supposedly I'll get it this weekend), but the Funnies included the Crocodile, AVRE, Ark, SBG Bridelayer,...
... weapons? ... as ... limited ... Oh, they're in there, but they were also in the WGC, so nothing new. Also, they're hardly superscience, are they :) (dunno...
... The Crab was also, technically, British, as we invented the idea... the Yanks decided they didn't want any non-standard equipment messing up their...
Thanks guys, this stuff is helping immensely. Now if the bad s**t happening to my family would stop, I could get back on track... Also, I'm using this "new"...
