|
|
Stay up to speed on the latest Groups news and updates, visit the
Groups blog today!
Description
|
The CONLANG list is devoted to the discussion of "constructed" or
"artifical" languages for general communication. It is essentially
concerned with creative linbguistics and not such formal languages such
as programming languages or mathematical notation, except as they may
relate to a proposal for a mthod of communication. Since many constructed
languages have a fictional background, this description is complicated by
not being anle to use possibly descriptive terms such as "human language"
which would be descriptive, if it were not prejudicial to the Alien
conlangs.
The reasons for constructing languages cover a wide range of reasons,
from proposals to enhance international communication, to the creation of
more logical languages to enhance thinking or specialized forms of
communication, to exploring linguistic theory through model-building, as
background for fictional creation, as art for art's sake, and just for
fun.
SHORT AUXLANG DESCRIPTION, AND WHY THERE ARE TWO LISTS
The AUXLANG list is devoted to discussions of the merits and practicality
of particular International Auxiliary Languages -- languages intended to
enhance international communication. Since this topic inspires great
devotion and frequently also inspires high volumes of debate about the
merits and drawbacks of particular languages like Esperanto, the
discussion especially of the political, and strategic questions of IALs
has been moved to AUXLANG. Auxiliary languages are not banned from the
more general discussion on CONLANG, but the discussion's significance
should extend beyond the IAL community. For example, a discussion of
ergative case marking applied to Esperanto might be interesting to the
general community -- a lengthy discussion of the merits and disadvantages
of having case markings in an IAL would not be.
FLAMING
As current listowner for both lists, I would appreciate i
|
Messages in this group are sent from a remote email list:conlang@egroups.com
Re: Cloakroom
... Oh that word! It also sounds like the Swedish word for "edge", which I found out unpleasantly once. My dad was driving me in my wheelchair, and I was
Posted - Thu May 15, 2008 4:23 pm
|
Benct Philip Jonsson
melroch@...
Send Email
|
Re: Cloakroom
... So I understood. I only foresaw a confusion for myself because in my L1 vowel length is only marginally distinctive (being a function of consonantal
Posted - Thu May 15, 2008 4:14 pm
|
Benct Philip Jonsson
melroch@...
Send Email
|
Re: Cloakroom
... From: Benct Philip Jonsson Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:27 PM "Now that's pretty important a distinction in meaning to place on vowel length and a
Posted - Thu May 15, 2008 2:03 pm
|
Daniel Prohaska
daniel@...
Send Email
|
Re: Cloakroom
... The vowel-length distinction is all over the place in AusE (and non-rhotic Englishes generally), so I don't know why it's less suitable for importance than
Posted - Thu May 15, 2008 12:47 pm
|
Mark J. Reed
markjreed@...
Send Email
|
Re: Cloakroom
... ... "Can't" spoken carefully in isolation /ka:nt/ differs from another word in Australian English purely by length. Said word has already caused the
Posted - Thu May 15, 2008 12:44 pm
|
Tristan McLeay
conlang@...
Send Email
|
Add conlang to your personalized My Yahoo! page What's This?
|
Message History
Group Email Addresses
| Post message: |
conlang@egroups.com |
|