Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
lawashington · LaWashington is a FREE e-mail forum for Q&A among Washington's legal community.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1112 - 1141 of 3768   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1112
The WA Supreme Court came down today on the side of junk science, upholding the Frye admissability of DID (formerly Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD))....
Gary A. Preble
preble@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
7:06 am
1113
... Our local priest says the best English translation is "Tyrants are always that way." In the context of Booth & Lincoln, I suspect what was meant was "Thus...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
3:29 pm
1114
I'm sorry, but after reading the opinion I don't understand how this is junk science. DID is a diagnosis found in the DSM-IV. There are numerous articles ...
Dr. Elizabeth W. Riggs
ewriggs@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
3:32 pm
1115
... Just because it's in the DSM-IV doesn't mean it isn't junk. The DSM is just a set of labels. Moreover, there remains a raging debate about whether MPD...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
4:41 pm
1116
Boy, first you trot out your fancy Latin phrases, now art history and technique. Throw in your deft grasp of statistics and epidemiology--we have a...
Ray P.
ray_p@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
7:09 pm
1117
Michael Thanks again. Once the true fallacy of the defense tactic of comparing apples to oranges is pointed out we will see a whole new way of thinking. Tencer...
wrobison
wrobison@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
7:35 pm
1118
... Mike, Bill, & everyone: OK, you're right. BUT, I must say it again: for every whore testifying for an insurance co., there is at least one testifying for ...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
8:39 pm
1119
For anyone who is interested. The following case is the closest I could find comparable to my issue: Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp., 123 Wn.2d 15,...
Christopher Michael D...
cmichaeldavis@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
8:40 pm
1120
Res ipsa loquitur, "the thing speaks for it's self" Labor and Industries, hire medical whores by the dozen. I guess it's cheaper that way? Where is this one? ...
Julie Winters
charlielawdogs@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
9:39 pm
1121
... I suppose. But if have seen what passes sometimes for "expert" testimony on behalf of claimants at the BIIA, you'd see my point. L&I is remarkable...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 1999
10:11 pm
1122
John, I agree that junk science exists on both sides, however, I don't believe that it is a 1:1 ratio as do you (at least in PI work). For a defense expert to...
Michael Freeman
drmfreeman@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 1999
12:36 am
1123
It is "outrages", when the doctor has superior knowledge, and continues to lie, protecting Labor and Industries interest. They are like bad trainers at the...
Julie Winters
charlielawdogs@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 1999
7:07 pm
1124
<Finally, the truth!> LABOR LAW / WORKERS' COMPENSATION PORT OF PORTLAND v OWCP (09/27/99 - No. 9870492) Where an employee's total disability naturally ...
Julie Winters
charlielawdogs@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 1999
8:34 pm
1125
... OK, Julie & several others need some enlightenment here. OWCP vs Port of Portland arises under the Longshore Act, which is a form of workmens'...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 1999
9:16 pm
1126
Dear John, Obviously, you are a good attorney, and thank you for the site, it will give us something to study. I thought this case could be used to show a...
Julie Winters
charlielawdogs@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 1999
4:17 pm
1127
I recently received the following regarding a new book on so-called MPD. Gary Preble =================================================== Creating Hysteria ...
Gary A. Preble
preble@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 1999
4:17 pm
1128
... Fed law takes precedence only when there is a Fed law which applies AND the constitution gives the Feds the jurisdiction. Here, there is no Fed law...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 1999
7:04 pm
1129
Steve: You should get some idea of how comfortable you are with learning their system by getting a demo by a salesman at your office, if that is possible. If...
Pratum, Mike
mpratum@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 1999
7:04 pm
1130
Thank you once again. The law site you gave us is making things more clear. ... *Would that be the Supremacy clause? ... What would the special circumstances...
Julie Winters
charlielawdogs@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 1999
10:02 pm
1131
I think that Junk Science is a term best reserved for truly eggregious acts of scientific pillaging, rather than an area of scientific dispute. The debate as...
Michael Freeman
drmfreeman@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 1999
11:52 pm
1132
... Well, Yes & No. Yes, the supremacy clause applies, but only where the Feds have jurisdiction. In the TX case I mentioned, Congress assumed the Supremacy...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 4, 1999
2:05 am
1133
... Mike: Well, I guess here we must agree to disagree. I've done PI work for 20+ years, pltf & df. I use the 1:1 ratio because I actually did a small...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 4, 1999
2:05 am
1134
right john. Bill Robison ... thinking. ... like ... so ... severe ... consciousness ... his...
wrobison
wrobison@...
Send Email
Oct 4, 1999
5:23 pm
1135
I don't know whether the diagnosis of MPD is or is not junk science, but I would note that Washington courts have repeatedly said it is not their task to come...
Pete Livengood
plivengood@...
Send Email
Oct 4, 1999
11:40 pm
1136
Pete: You took the words out of my mouth. I have had this same conversation w/ Nick Bacetich. I repeat my warning: beware what you preach., John Schedler ...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 5, 1999
3:14 am
1137
I thought I would muse for a moment on the many postings on Junk Science, it appears to be of great concern to all, as it should be. To start with, I would...
Mike Cerf
mcerf@...
Send Email
Oct 5, 1999
3:44 pm
1138
Good post, but I suspect some will be critical of you. YOu hit the two main points though, the only way the insurer is going to feel it is by 1) bad faith and...
Tom D'Amore
tom@...
Send Email
Oct 5, 1999
3:59 pm
1139
I agree with Tom: this is a good post worth hearing. I don't think too many will be critical, because we know Mike as who is fair, but comes from a different...
Pete Livengood
plivengood@...
Send Email
Oct 5, 1999
7:09 pm
1140
Listmates: Earlier this summer, LaWashingtonian Kim Putnam successfully litigated a low property damage crash case with some creative lawyering. Courtesy of...
Pete Livengood
plivengood@...
Send Email
Oct 6, 1999
1:51 am
1141
... OK, square your brief w/ Patterson v. Horton ,84 Wn.App. 531, 929 P.2d 1125 (1997) [Div II, op by Seinfeld]. I quote headnote 7, West Key Nș 191: "To...
John Schedler
JWS@...
Send Email
Oct 6, 1999
3:53 pm
Messages 1112 - 1141 of 3768   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help