At 08:36 PM 8/30/99 +0200, Carsten Hoeger wrote: [snip] ... Presumably these procmail filters add something to the headers so that a situation like this is...
Stan Ryckman
stanr@...
Sep 1, 1999 1:59 pm
9299
Wouldn't another solution be to patch Majordomo to use a different mail alias for approving messages -- say, `listname-approve'? Then the Delivered-To header...
Tim Pierce
twp@...
Sep 1, 1999 5:37 pm
9300
... I had wondered this same thing, but just went to it tonight: http://catalog.com/vivian/interest-group-search.html Glad to see your site is back online,...
Christopher Knight
chris@...
Sep 2, 1999 2:16 am
9301
Dear HotMail postmasters, Cranfield hosts a mailing list of MBA students, and a number of these have their mail forwarded to hotmail.com addresses. A recent ...
Jeffrey Goldberg
J.Goldberg@...
Sep 6, 1999 8:24 pm
9302
... Looks like hotmail barfed to me. I've seen those rarely... -- Chuq Von Rospach (Hockey fan? <http://www.plaidworks.com/hockey/>) Apple Mail List Gnome...
Chuq Von Rospach
chuqui@...
Sep 7, 1999 12:22 am
9303
In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.9909061924010.22595-100000@... ... Doesn't everybody? ... I may be mistaken, but I believe that number is just...
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg@...
Sep 7, 1999 1:29 am
9304
... 100000@... ... [...] ... That is, 100 recipients is the 'minimum maximum' required by the protocol, and so if you can't handle 100...
Bernie Cosell
bernie@...
Sep 7, 1999 5:01 am
9305
... No. ... <http://www.imc.org/draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd> -- you are mistaken, sir. According to the latest draft of the standard update for RFC821, a...
Chuq Von Rospach
chuqui@...
Sep 7, 1999 5:10 am
9306
... That is almost certainly the case. Later messages went through fine. I was just concerned because it was the list I had with the largest number of hotmail...
Jeffrey Goldberg
J.Goldberg@...
Sep 7, 1999 6:56 am
9307
... I looked at a few things after I wrote that and could not find a requirement (or suggestion) of accepting 100 recipients. There is a requirement in RFC...
Jeffrey Goldberg
J.Goldberg@...
Sep 7, 1999 7:38 am
9308
... As was I in my previous posting. While RFC821 is at best vague on the matter (my reading is that one can issue a 552 (excessive number of recipients) for...
Jeffrey Goldberg
J.Goldberg@...
Sep 7, 1999 9:10 am
9309
... My dear Chuq, Regardless of whatever may be said in the draft replacement for RFC821, the fact of the matter is that a mail server _is_ allowed to give a...
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg@...
Sep 7, 1999 10:16 am
9310
... then you are not conformant with the standards. which is your choice, but don't tell others it's okay. -- Chuq Von Rospach (Hockey fan?...
Chuq Von Rospach
chuqui@...
Sep 7, 1999 4:35 pm
9311
... From the standpoint of the SMTP *client*, this restriction is essentially meaningless, since of course the server is permitted to return a 4xx code to...
Russ Allbery
rra@...
Sep 7, 1999 4:51 pm
9312
... It's not so relevant with respect to spam, but is definitely relevant from a list administration perspective. We couldn't possibly accept mail with 100...
Tim Pierce
twp@...
Sep 7, 1999 7:26 pm
9313
... From the DRUMS SMTP-update document, section 4.5.3 The minimum total number of recipients that must be buffered is 100 recipients. Rejection of messages...
Jeffrey Goldberg
J.Goldberg@...
Sep 7, 1999 8:32 pm
9314
I'm forwarding a message that was sent to a list owner address that happens to include me. For those who don't know (those outside of the UK) ic24.net is a...
Jeffrey Goldberg
J.Goldberg@...
Sep 11, 1999 8:56 am
9315
My majordomo log shows: Oct 01 05:35:51 gsp.org majordomo[29085] {67360-trace-robot@...} lists There doesn't seem to be any useful content at...
Rich Kulawiec
rsk@...
Oct 1, 1999 7:40 pm
9316
... I see similar probes from <xxxxxx>-trace-robot@... to listar@<domain> on various of my machines. (I'm not sure whether to be flattered or...
Jeremy Blackman
loki@...
Oct 2, 1999 12:30 am
9317
It's probing my majordomo lists as well. I keep copies of my request mail, so here's what it said. I'm not sure why the world needs yet another list spider. ...
John R Levine
johnl@...
Oct 2, 1999 3:55 am
9318
... I suspect you're right, though their web page (See http://www.speed-link.de/internetfall/) doesn't go so far as to mention subscription services - just a...
David Shaw
dshaw@...
Oct 2, 1999 3:42 pm
9320
Mark E. Mallett
mem@...
Oct 3, 1999 12:31 am
9321
Someone wants to be able to post to my e-mail discussion list anonymously. Lives literally depend on this person being able to keep his/her identity anonymous...
A. Shettle
RED_TREK@...
Oct 3, 1999 9:49 pm
9322
... The most reasonable solution is a Web mail account, such as iName (mail.com), usa.net, HotMail, or a dozen others. Some, perhaps most, of these, send the...
Michael C. Berch
mcb@...
Oct 3, 1999 10:43 pm
9323
... The simplest, and probably most fool-proof method, is simply to have this person open an account at one of the various free web-based email services, such...
Nathan J. Mehl
memory@...
Oct 4, 1999 12:25 am
9324
I've had a funny problem with my mailing list over the weekend: My list is sent out as BCCs and usually there is no problem, but I've had email going through...
EDA Resource Centre
eda.inc@...
Oct 4, 1999 12:48 am
9325
... Quite right. There are free web mail servers all over the world, so to be particularly secure the anonymous correspondent should look for one in a country...
John R Levine
johnl@...
Oct 4, 1999 1:33 am
9326
Andrea, I encourage people to post anon to the mailing lists I run if they feel they need to. Most people use their real names and addresses but even "real"...
Cyndi Norman
cnorman@...
Oct 4, 1999 1:42 am
9327
[Actually, "servers failing to alter email" is more like it.] Stuart got a bounce from Prodigy that was remailed to his list's submission ... Yes, you are...
David W. Tamkin
dattier@...
Oct 4, 1999 8:16 pm
9328
... This is a short term problem, fortunately. Any prodigy.com address is the old Prodigy Classic videotex service which will be shut down before the end of...
