Saundspel, the phonology forum, is a discussion group for those interested in spelling by sound, applied linguistics, writing systems, history, and spelling reform.
If you have a language related question, post it here. If you post something that is not language related, you will be banned from the group.
The Saundspel discussion group was originally set up to build a machine readable IPA analog for transcribing English speech. SAMPA* was available but not designed as a writing system. ENgliS , Unigraf, and similar notations are about as close as we have come to finding an easily read and typed way to represent 40+ sounds with a 26 character (ASCII) keyboard. An improved orthography for World English (see euro-english) remains a key but not the sole concern of this group. [more]
Critique of German Dictionary notation from John Wells. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/blog.htm  One wonders who these transcriptions are for. Is this
David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party " Listen to this. It's the President of the Spelling Society. He said, and I quote, "people should be able
Thanks pilot, Changing "of" to "uv" regularizes the sound of ~v as spelled by "v" and not by "f". This is a The "u" as "uh" ~u is standard USA accent. For
Would you say "for I" or "for me". Then why should it be **for you and I. I would always say "for you and me". Dan ________________________________________
Take a course and have no trouble? Doubt it. Would those taking the course have no trouble distinguishing long e from short i in thin and think. If they